South Carolina Board of Education Bans Four Books

News Summary

On February 5, 2025, the South Carolina Board of Education voted to ban four specific books from public schools, a decision stemming from a local resident’s complaints. The banned titles include widely discussed books such as ‘Perks of Being a Wallflower’ and ‘All Boys Aren’t Blue’. This controversial move reflects ongoing debates about censorship in education and student access to diverse literature, with mixed community reactions following the decision.

South Carolina Board of Education Hits the Brakes on Four Books

In a significant and somewhat controversial move, the South Carolina Board of Education has voted to ban four specific books from public schools statewide. The decision was reached on February 5, 2025, and reflects a growing trend concerning what materials are appropriate for school curricula.

The impetus for this ban came from a local resident, Elizabeth “Ivie” Szalai, who made headlines for her earlier attempts to eliminate nearly a hundred books from the Beaufort County School District. After her initial efforts only yielded five removals, she turned to the state for broader action. The books banned as a result of this decision are:

• “Perks of Being a Wallflower” by Stephen Chbosky
• “All Boys Aren’t Blue” by George M. Johnson
• “Flamer” by Mike Curato
• “Push” by Sapphire

The decision is supported by Regulation 43-170, which allows the removal of materials that include any descriptions or visual depictions of sexual conduct. The board made it clear that if a book meets the definition of sexually explicit content according to state laws, it automatically falls under this ban.

Numbers Add Up: Banned Books in the State

With these four new additions, the total number of banned books in South Carolina public schools now stands at 11. Previous titles that have faced the same fate include:

• “Damsel” by Elana Arnold
• “Ugly Love” by Colleen Hoover
• Several titles by Sarah J. Maas

Interestingly, during the same board meeting, two other books, “House on Mango Street” and “Bronx Masquerade”, managed to stay on the shelves, demonstrating that not all literature is under fire.

Voices from the Board

The decision to ban books was not unanimous, reflecting differing opinions amongst the board members. One member, who opposed the removal of “Push”, raised concerns about the implications of these bans. Another member cautioned that relying on a single complaint to guide statewide removals could lead to an overly restrictive environment.

Conversely, a board member emphasized that it is essential for the board to enforce the regulations defined by the state, and this includes responding to content complaints, independent of their frequency.

Community Response: A Divided Opinion

The community’s reaction to these book bans has been mixed and, quite frankly, a bit heated. Many educators and residents are voicing concerns that the bans threaten students’ access to diverse literature. They worry that such actions may narrow the scope of literature available in schools and curtail meaningful discussions surrounding themes of identity, consent, and personal adversity.

On the other hand, some parents herald the book bans as a necessary step in shielding children from material they deem is not appropriate for their age. Conflicts surrounding this issue are becoming ever-more prevalent, as the discussions around censorship and educational content intensify.

The Road Ahead

This vote marks a pivotal moment in ongoing debates about literacy, education, and age-appropriate content in classrooms. The district has indicated that they will begin the removal of the banned books and secure them in a designated location. Additionally, it has been noted that Szalai’s actions have resulted in backlash and even pending lawsuits, as her book-banning campaign continues to attract national media attention.

As this topic continues to evolve, it raises significant questions about the future of literary inclusion versus censorship in schools. Will educators and students alike feel the repercussions, or will this be the start of deeper conversations about the books we choose to share with young minds? Only time will tell.

Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic

HERE Resources

South Carolina Softball Prepares for Fall Season at University
Beaufort County’s Book Ban Controversy: Community Insights
Beaufort Prepares for a Grand Celebration of the American Revolution
Beaufort County Offices and Parks Reopen January 27, 2025
Target Ready to Refresh Marketing Strategy for a Better Shopping Experience in 2025
Beaufort County Jail Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Strip Searches
Oconee Federal Financial Corp. Reports Strong Fourth Quarter Results
Beaufort Prepares for the Annual Oyster Festival
Beaufort’s House District 124 Race: Incumbent Faces Fresh Challenge on Key Issues
Beaufort County Senate Candidates Clash Over Abortion, Education, and Community Concerns

Additional Resources

• WSAV: South Carolina Book Ban Debate
• WCCB Charlotte: Teachers Feel Censored
• Island Packet: South Carolina Education News
• MSN: SC Board of Education Discusses Book Bans
• SC Daily Gazette: Book Removal in Schools
• Wikipedia: Censorship
• Google Search: Book Bans South Carolina
• Google Scholar: South Carolina Education Book Bans
• Encyclopedia Britannica: Book Banning
• Google News: South Carolina Book Ban